FC Barcelona: The Correct Way To Play Football
It’s an age-old argument, one that is far-reaching, controversial and oh so topical given the recent struggles in El Clasico: just what is the "correct" way to play football? Now, people suggest the answer can only ever be subjective, and in essence, they are right, but quite simply, I would care to argue there is only one way and conveniently enough, it encapsulates the Barcelona ethos.
Pass and move, possession play, Totaal Voetbal. It is all one and the same, focusing on attack as the best form of defense; superior technical ability as opposed to sheer athleticism and brute force. Good versus evil if you are so inclined to believe. Positional interchange and constant pressure are paramount, counter-attacking is frowned upon. Certainly it is the polar opposite of Catenaccio, and ever since Total Football’s introduction into the world of football around the times of Ferenc Puskas, Catenaccio has been trying to play catch up.
It’s a healthy rivalry, but the fact of the matter is this: Total Football is always one step ahead. Ever since the 1930s when Uruguay dominated the inaugural World Cup right through to Spain’s triumph in 2010, international football has always favoured those who proactively go in search of the win. Pragmatic and functional football has its place as well, but historically, teams like Brazil, Argentina and more recently Spain have seen more success.
However, that’s beside the point considering that this is a Barcelona blog, what I mean is Barcelona play the correct brand of football when compared to their rivals. Tiki-taka is the right way to play, far superior to whatever you want to call Jose Mourinho’s tactics. Quite simply, only one of the two tactics can lead to long-term success.
Look at Jose Mourinho’s record at any club. Astounding levels of success are the norm, but he leaves within three years, and typically, the side he leaves dip in form soon after. Have you ever stopped to ask yourself why? Why does this happen? Why doesn’t he stay? Well, Mourinho knows it himself, you cannot sustain a high level of success for very long, but when you play in the way that he has become famous for, it becomes impossible.
We are witnessing it with FC Barcelona at this current point in time. The level of success is unprecedented, but after a few years, the motivation levels fall. Not only that but the concentration of the players slowly decays, leading to poor results, ultimately making further success difficult. With tiki-taka, the high-line of pressure slowly drops further and further back, the passing can become laboured and inaccurate, while the movement could cease to exist entirely.
In Catenaccio or similar tactics like those employed by Jose Mourinho it is worse. Catenaccio requires non-stop concentration, while the positional interchange of tiki-taka allows certain players to rest, both physically and mentally during a match. Cast your mind back to the Champions League semi-final of 2010, when Mourinho’s Inter ousted Barcelona. Would that have been possible if any one of the Inter defense lost concentration at any stage? Doubtful.
Furthermore, it is hard for the players to continue playing defensively after they achieve success. If you are recognised as the best in Europe, why would you set out to defend?
Jose Mourinho is a smart man. He left Porto after two seasons for Chelsea, where he stayed for a little over three seasons. It was a surprising move, but when he realised that he could no longer get the best out of the players with his tactics ( after a 1-1 draw with Rosenborg), he left the club. Mourinho had learnt his mistake, the tactics were not the problem per se, they had lead to a high level of success, but after a couple of years, the players could not maintain that level of concentration, if anyone remembers the Rosenborg goal in that match, it was down to complacency from John Terry to let the centre-back nip ahead and connect with the volley.
Mourinho joined Inter Milan were he won the treble, but left immediately to join Real Madrid. Unsurprisingly, the Inter Milan side that was custom-made to play on the counter attack declined at an alarming rate, before being decimated by Tottenham Hotspur the following year.
Now we have the rumours that Jose Mourinho will leave Real Madrid at the end of the season, whatever happens at the capital club. It certainly would not be surprising. Barcelona are working through a blip, but nothing more. The positional flexibility means that players can be moved around to new positions if only to keep them on their toes. The 3-4-3? Well, that’s merely an extension of the same philosophy. Constant evolution to not only stay one step ahead of Catenaccio and Mourinho, but to keep the players focused on the prize.
Tiki-taka is currently being taught to every kid at La Masia, and despite the poor result, the Villarreal match showed us that there are more stars on the way. Cristian Tello was a breath of fresh air, while we know of the talent that Gerard Deulofeu, Jean Marie Dongou and Rafinha Alcantara (among countless others) possess. Can you teach counter-attacking to young players?
If you need convincing, just look to the future, how will Barcelona be playing in ten years? One imagines it will be exactly the same. Now compare that to Real Madrid. How will Los Blancos be playing in a year let alone in ten? Attacking football is football’s past, present and future. After all, it is the right way to play...
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good piece..
And glad u chose to write about this..especially since there are even some barca fans who seem to think mou and his tactics are a good thing…
Rec’d
Follow me on Twitter @InderMethil
Thanks Inder
You know I appreciate it :)
Manager on Barca Blaugranes
If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter
by Arron Duckling on Jan 30, 2012 9:46 PM CET up reply actions
Great piece coupled with fantastic timing
We win or lose playing the same style. Our team never play like underdogs both home and away. That’s the main reason why our youth system is the best there is, all the kids grow up knowing that there is a spot for them in the first team where they will instantly fit in without an “iota of doubt” :)
"You are a stupid debater if you don't consider your opponent's point at all, slow down with the arrogance"
Follow me on Twitter @guidance7
by Guidance Mhlari on Jan 30, 2012 10:23 PM CET via mobile reply actions
Great article.
And a tribute to the tiki taka.
Mourinho has had success and well done to him, as Arron has presented the evidence, its not entirely the right way, Mou brings in the quick fix, buy the right players ect, but he has no plan for the future of his clubs, I dont think he cares what happens when he leaves.
by meadow on Jan 30, 2012 10:58 PM CET via mobile reply actions
Welcome to BB @NASHIE13
It’s good to have you on board, may this be the first of many more posts to come ;-)
"You are a stupid debater if you don't consider your opponent's point at all, slow down with the arrogance"
Follow me on Twitter @guidance7
by Guidance Mhlari on Jan 31, 2012 12:32 AM CET via mobile up reply actions
Thanks
Nice to see you on the blog now :)
Manager on Barca Blaugranes
If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter
by Arron Duckling on Jan 31, 2012 6:01 PM CET up reply actions
In terms of longevity/timelessness, I agree.
Attacking football, emphasis on technique and player versatility are all important for players to learn early. And depending on how good the team is, it can bring success for longer periods than other styles.
But if you take ‘correct’ to mean ‘valid’ in any given match then I disagree. As long as you start with 10 outfield players and 1 goalkeeper, all tactics, formations and strategies are valid. I’m a big Stoke fan, simply because they are the polar opposite to Barcelona. It’s not very pleasing to look at, especially if you’re used to Barcelona but it works (to an extent, and I like it. Everyone playing the same style and formation wouldn’t be as good as the clash of styles that we’ve seen throughout football history.
And to give some perspective / something to ponder, Helenio Herrera, the father of Catenaccio, was the coach of a very attacking Barcelona side (90+ goals in a season I believe) before he moved to Inter and famously won back-to-back European Cups with what most of us here would call “anti-football”.
I agree with that
The only ‘correct’ way to play football is as long as you obey the laws of the game.
There are ‘correct’ ways based on one’s personal preferences and aesthetic beliefs, but that’s just opinion, not fact.
Arteta, it's all about the right pass it goes left to the left foot of VAN PERSIE
Proud member of Fusillade and The Short Fuse
by Aidan Gibson on Jan 31, 2012 3:50 AM CET up reply actions
Agreed
You stated good points, difficult to disagree
"You are a stupid debater if you don't consider your opponent's point at all, slow down with the arrogance"
Follow me on Twitter @guidance7
by Guidance Mhlari on Jan 31, 2012 8:10 AM CET via mobile up reply actions
of course
I agree there are numerous other ways to play football, and in a given match, they can be the right way to play, but never truly lead to long-term success
Manager on Barca Blaugranes
If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter
by Arron Duckling on Jan 31, 2012 8:22 AM CET via mobile up reply actions
I disagree with that
Stoke have had long term success playing a specific style.
Wolverhampton Wanderers won the league 3 years in a row playing direct football, as did Manchester United in the early 90s.
Arteta, it's all about the right pass it goes left to the left foot of VAN PERSIE
Proud member of Fusillade and The Short Fuse
Domestic success, relative success and international success are different things
Brazil, Hungary, Argentina, Real Madrid of the 50s, Ajax, the Gre-No-Li Milan, the current Barcelona, Arsenal back in the early 00s, hell, even as far back as Preston in the 1800s when they went undefeated, all played attacking football.
What about the rise of Swansea and Brighton, and the inevitable rise of Swindon right now? None of them play “direct” football, and they simply overwhelm teams with superior technical ability. More often than not, attacking football is the way to go, although, I agree that it is not the only way to win football matches, but you will probably find that that Manchester United side was the best footballing side in England at that time anyway…
Manager on Barca Blaugranes
If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter
by Arron Duckling on Feb 1, 2012 5:46 PM CET up reply actions
International success?
La Grande Inter. 3 scudettos, 2 Champions Leagues.
Certainly weren’t attacking.
Arteta, it's all about the right pass it goes left to the left foot of VAN PERSIE
Proud member of Fusillade and The Short Fuse
Good work
I started watching them because of the way they play, beautiful “one-touch” game. Results do matter but the quality of football on display is also priceless.

by 



















